wealthschema/archetypes/r-03-government-teacher-pre-retiree
R-03Pre-RetirementPreservationlow tax complexity

Government/Teacher Pre-Retiree

Public sector employee with defined benefit pension, 403(b)/457, Social Security offset (WEP/GPO), retiree health benefits.

R-03 is the public-sector pre-retirement profile where the Windfall Elimination Provision, the Government Pension Offset, and a layered 403(b)/457 contribution surface combine to make Social Security and supplemental-savings projections wrong by default in software not built for them.

Age Range
55–65
Net Worth
$0–$100k
Cohort
Pre-Retirement

About this archetype

R-03 captures the public-sector pre-retiree — teachers, state and municipal employees, federal CSRS/FERS holdouts, and uniformed services civilians — where a defined-benefit pension is genuinely the dominant retirement vehicle and Social Security is partially or wholly offset. Two regulatory mechanics distinguish this archetype from every other pre-retirement profile in the catalog. The Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) reduces the worker's own Social Security benefit when they receive a pension from non-covered employment; the Government Pension Offset (GPO) reduces spousal and survivor Social Security benefits by two-thirds of the non-covered pension. Software that applies the standard PIA formula to an R-03 household will overstate Social Security income by thousands of dollars per month. Alongside this, the supplemental savings stack is unusual: a 403(b) for K-12 and nonprofit-hospital employees, a governmental 457(b) that has no 10% early-withdrawal penalty on separation regardless of age, and in many jurisdictions a DROP (Deferred Retirement Option Plan) election that lets the employee accrue pension payments into a side account for a defined period.

Cash flow reflects the mass-market wealth tier this archetype is calibrated to. Median combined income is $53,757 — materially below R-01 and R-02 — but median investable assets of $260k and median net worth of $466k are higher than the income alone would suggest, because the pension itself is the dominant retirement asset and the household has been saving the gap inside the 403(b)/457 stack rather than as W-2 deferrals into a corporate 401(k). Homeownership sits at 56%, slightly above the income cohort norm because public-employee mortgages benefit from MOP, state housing-finance-agency programs, and employer-tied housing assistance in some jurisdictions.

What separates R-03 from R-01 is not 'has a pension' — R-01 households often have one too — but the regulatory texture: WEP and GPO are R-03-only, retiree health benefits remain a real promise in this archetype where they have largely disappeared in R-01, and the 457(b) penalty-free-on-separation rule creates planning options that don't exist in 401(k)-based corporate retirements. The R-03 corpus is deliberately sized at 25 households to give buyers a tight, recognizable reference for the public-sector edge cases their software needs to handle without the noise of higher-balance corporate testing scenarios.

Defining characteristics

  • Defined-benefit pension as primary retirement asset
    Unlike R-01 where the DB pension is one of several large balance-sheet items, R-03 households are designed around the DB pension as the principal retirement income source. Benefit formulas are typically final-average-salary × years-of-service × multiplier.
  • WEP/GPO Social Security offsets
    The Windfall Elimination Provision reduces the worker's own Social Security benefit; the Government Pension Offset reduces spousal and survivor benefits by two-thirds of the non-covered pension. Software not applying both will materially overstate retirement income.
  • 403(b) and 457(b) layered contributions
    K-12 and public-sector employees can contribute to both a 403(b) and a governmental 457(b) — each with separate §402(g) limits, doubling the elective-deferral capacity. Final-three-years catch-up under §457(b)(3) is a distinguishing planning lever.
  • Retiree health benefits
    Employer-paid or subsidized retiree medical remains a meaningful benefit in this archetype. Bridge planning to Medicare is therefore typically less acute than in R-01 or R-02 — a defining contrast.
  • DROP program eligibility
    Many police, fire, and some teacher pension plans offer a Deferred Retirement Option Plan election that pays pension accruals into a side account for 3–8 years. DROP-vs-straight-retirement comparison is a defining R-03 calculation.
  • Mass-market wealth tier
    Median net worth of $466k and median income of $53,757 place R-03 firmly at the mass-market tier. The pension's actuarial value is implicit in the goal target amounts but not capitalized on the balance sheet.

Corpus signature

n = 25 households

Aggregated across the 25 R-03 households in the shipped v3 corpus corpus. Numbers describe the corpus, not population claims.

Median income
$54k
p25–p75 $49k–$72k
Median net worth
$466k
mean $514k
Liquid net worth
$199k
median
Investable assets
$260k
median
Income distribution
$25k–45k
5
$45k–65k
10
$65k–85k
6
$85k–105k
4
Net-worth distribution
$35k–235k
2
$235k–435k
4
$435k–635k
13
$635k–835k
6
Goals across the corpus
Retirement25 / 25
Legacy / estate25 / 25
Debt payoff14 / 25
Liability composition
Credit cards25 / 25
Auto loans14 / 25
Mortgages14 / 25
Student loans4 / 25
  • 14 of 25 (56%) are homeowners; the remainder rent.
  • CA, TX, PA account for 11 of 25 households — 44% of the corpus.
  • Median adult-member age is 62 (range 56–71 across primaries and spouses).
  • 7 of 25 (28%) carry one or more dependents.

Representative household

R-03-seed-16
Eric T.Married filing jointly·Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL

Eric and Melissa are the diagnostic R-03 case: a K-12 public-school employee married to a healthcare worker, both still in pre-retirement employment at ages 57 and 59, sitting essentially at the corpus net-worth median ($462,525 vs $465,921). Combined income of $67,989 is modest but the household carries $170k of accumulated retirement savings, a $170k mortgage, and only $11k of non-mortgage debt — the classic public-sector wealth shape where balance-sheet assets understate the household's true retirement position because the DB pension is not capitalized. Retirement shows off-track against a $1.25M target the explicit balance sheet cannot reach, while the $441k legacy goal is on track at $367k of progress — a household that fails a naive net-worth-to-target test but passes a properly modeled pension-plus-Social-Security income-replacement test once WEP is applied to the worker's own benefit and GPO is applied to spousal coverage.

Combined income
$67,989
Net worth
$462,525
Liquid NW
$134,286
Ages
57 / 59
Top goals on this household
Retirement
$1,251,600
Legacy / estate
$440,722
Debt payoff
$28,058

Schema fields covered

Every R-03 household ships with — at minimum — these JSON fields populated. The full schema is documented in the data set you purchase.

members[].age
income.combined_gross
net_worth.total
filing_status
income.social_security_benefit
income.pension_annual
income.rmd_schedule
planning.withdrawal_sequence

Who builds against this archetype

Three buyer profiles draw on R-03 most heavily. Retirement-planning software teams use it to validate WEP and GPO calculations against published SSA examples — a calculation absent in corporate-pre-retiree test corpora and critical for any platform that markets to teachers, firefighters, police, or municipal employees. Benefits-administration vendors serving state pension systems and 403(b)/457 plan providers use the corpus to test contribution-limit edge cases, including the §457(b)(3) final-three-years catch-up and the §414(v) age-50 catch-up stacked across multiple plan types. Wealth platforms with public-sector advisor channels (public-sector retirement-plan recordkeepers) use R-03 to populate realistic retiree-health-benefit cost projections and DROP-vs-retire decision UX.

Testing scenarios this corpus is calibrated for

  • 01WEP calculation engines: apply the modified PIA formula with the WEP first-bend-point reduction for workers with fewer than 30 years of substantial earnings under covered employment.
  • 02GPO calculation flows: reduce spousal and survivor Social Security by two-thirds of the non-covered government pension.
  • 03403(b) + 457(b) coordinated contribution-limit validators, including separate §402(g) limits and the §457(b)(3) final-three-years catch-up.
  • 04DROP program election modeling: side-account accrual vs straight retirement, including the DROP-balance distribution options at separation.
  • 05Retiree health benefit cost projection where the employer subsidy continues post-retirement — a feature largely absent from R-01 scenarios.
  • 06Pension-survivor-option election UX, with reduction factors and life-expectancy sensitivity for joint-and-survivor variants.

Edge cases and what's not in this corpus

R-03 is calibrated as a US public-sector pre-retiree where the DB pension and Social Security are both in play (with WEP/GPO applied). Federal employees under FERS (where Social Security is fully covered alongside a smaller DB component and a TSP) are partially represented; pure CSRS-only edge cases are rare in the corpus because the cohort has largely retired. Public-sector employees who never enrolled in a DB plan and rely solely on a 401(a)/457 stack are not the intended fit — closer to P-05. Military pre-retirees with uniformed DB-pension elections belong in MV-02. Recently retired public-sector households are in RE-03 (the pension-rich early retiree) rather than R-03. Cross-border or foreign-pension-receiving households are excluded.

Calibration notes

Income bands during v3 synthesis were anchored to BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics for K-12 teachers, state and local government workers, and uniformed-services civilians in the 55–65 age cohort. Pension-prevalence and 403(b)/457 participation rates were loosely informed by EBSA Form 5500 filings for governmental plans. WEP/GPO applicability is implicit in the household structure — the corpus assumes the dominant pension is non-covered employment for Social Security purposes, which is the realistic case for most state-teacher and many municipal plans. State distribution favors CA, TX, and PA where large state pension systems concentrate the relevant testing scenarios. Per CLAUDE.md §9 the corpus is frozen and not regenerable; calibration claims here are descriptive rather than reproducible.

How this differs from related archetypes

Frequently asked questions

What does the R-03 archetype represent?+

R-03 is the Government/Teacher Pre-Retiree: a public-sector employee within five to ten years of retirement, with a defined-benefit pension as the primary retirement asset, a 403(b) or 457(b) supplemental savings stack, retiree health benefits, and Social Security partially or wholly offset by WEP and GPO.

How do WEP and GPO apply to R-03 households?+

The Windfall Elimination Provision modifies the Social Security benefit formula's first bend point for workers who receive a pension from non-covered employment and have fewer than 30 years of substantial covered earnings. The Government Pension Offset reduces spousal or survivor Social Security by two-thirds of the non-covered government pension. The corpus assumes the dominant pension is non-covered, which is the realistic case for most state teacher plans and many municipal plans.

Does R-03 include federal FERS employees?+

Partially. FERS employees have Social Security coverage (so WEP/GPO does not generally apply), a smaller FERS basic-benefit DB component, and a TSP. R-03 leans toward state and local plans where WEP/GPO is the planning issue; for FERS-specific testing scenarios buyers typically apply additional overlays to the household structure.

How does R-03 differ from R-01 (Corporate Pre-Retiree)?+

R-01 is private-sector with full Social Security coverage and typically a larger 401(k) plus NQDC stack at a higher wealth tier. R-03 is public-sector with a dominant non-covered DB pension, WEP/GPO applied to Social Security, a 403(b)/457 layered stack, and retiree health benefits that mitigate the pre-Medicare bridge. The diagnostic difference is the regulatory texture, not just sector.

Which data sets include R-03 households?+

R-03 is tagged for six bundles — B03, B06, B14, B18, B19, and B25 — covering retirement income, healthcare and Medicare, employee benefits, decumulation, Social Security optimization, and public-sector employee planning. See the sidebar for the specific data sets that ship R-03 households.

Is the R-03 corpus regenerable?+

No. The v3 corpus is frozen and not regenerable from current code (drift was confirmed on 2026-05-09). The 25 R-03 households are a fixed reference dataset; sampler improvements land in v4 with per-archetype golden fixtures in CI to prevent silent drift.

Get this archetype's data

Download households matching this archetype as part of a Wealth Data Set.

Browse Data Sets

Life Stage

Formation
Accumulation
Preservation
Distribution
Transfer