Is My Test Corpus Reg-BI Defensible? — Wizard
Reg BI exam outcomes are predictable from the corpus. An examiner walks through specific recommendation cases asking whether the firm had the data, used the data, and structurally documented the process. This wizard flags the gap pattern in your corpus before the examiner does.
What you walk away with
~2 min · 3 questions · 4 possible outcomes- A defensibility verdict — 'Audit-Ready' / 'Defensible' / 'Findings Possible' / 'Findings Likely.'
- A linked Reg BI Audit-Readiness Scorecard for the granular score.
- A specific dataset that closes the highest-leverage gap.
Does the corpus capture each recommendation event with a structured rationale?
Structured = which suitability fields were considered, what alternative was rejected, who reviewed it.
FAQ
Does this verdict align with the Reg BI Audit-Readiness Scorecard bands?
Yes — this wizard is a structural triage that maps to the same four-band model the scorecard uses. The wizard is faster (3 questions) but coarser; the scorecard scores against ~16 items for a granular view.
What if we use a third-party recommendation engine?
The firm is responsible regardless of the source. If the engine vendor cannot produce the recommendation rationale per event, that's a Care Obligation gap and a vendor-management gap simultaneously.